首页> 外文OA文献 >Return to work or job transition? : Employer dilemmas in taking social responsibility for return to work in local workplace practice
【2h】

Return to work or job transition? : Employer dilemmas in taking social responsibility for return to work in local workplace practice

机译:重返工作岗位还是工作过渡? :雇主在当地工作场所重返工作中承担社会责任的困境

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Purpose: The aim was to analyze the role and activities of employers with regard to return to work (RTW), in local workplace practice. Method: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with sick-listed workers and their supervisors in 18 workplaces (n  = 36). The analytical approach to study the role of employers in RTW was based on the three-domain model of social corporate responsibility. The model illustrates the linkage between corporations and their social environment, and consists of three areas of corporate responsibility: economic, legal and ethical. Results: Employers had difficulties in taking social responsibility for RTW, in that economic considerations regarding their business took precedence over legal and ethical considerations. Employers engaged in either “RTW activities” or “transition activities” that were applied differently depending on how valued sick-listed workers were considered to be to their business, and on the nature of the job (e.g. availability of suitable work adjustments). Conclusions: This study suggests that Swedish legislation and policies does not always adequately prompt employers to engage in RTW. There is a need for further attention to the organizational conditions for employers to take social responsibility for RTW in the context of business pressure and work intensification. Implications for Rehabilitation Employers may have difficulties in taking social responsibility for RTW when economic considerations regarding their business take precedence over legal and ethical considerations. Rehabilitation professionals should be aware of that outcomes of an RTW process can be influenced by the worker’s value to the employer and the nature of the job (e.g. availability of suitable work adjustments). “Low-value” workers at workplaces with limited possibilities to offer workplace adjustments may run a high risk of dismissal. Swedish legislation and policies may need reforms to put more pressure on employers to promote RTW.
机译:目的:目的是分析雇主在当地工作场所实践中关于重返工作岗位(RTW)的作用和活动。方法:在18个工作场所(n = 36)对病假工人及其上司进行了半结构化访谈。研究雇主在RTW中的角色的分析方法基于社会企业责任的三域模型。该模型说明了公司与其社会环境之间的联系,并包括公司责任的三个方面:经济,法律和道德。结果:雇主在承担RTW的社会责任方面遇到困难,因为与业务有关的经济因素优先于法律和道德因素。雇主从事“ RTW活动”或“过渡活动”的方式有所不同,具体取决于视作病态列出的工人对其业务的重视程度以及工作的性质(例如,进行适当的工作调整)。结论:这项研究表明,瑞典的立法和政策并不总是能充分促使雇主从事RTW。在业务压力和工作紧张的背景下,需要进一步关注雇主为RTW承担社会责任的组织条件。对康复的启示如果与业务有关的经济因素优先于法律和道德因素,则雇主可能难以承担对RTW的社会责任。康复专业人士应意识到,RTW流程的结果会受到工人对雇主的价值和工作性质(例如,提供适当的工作调整)的影响。在工作场所进行调整的可能性有限的工作场所中的“低价值”工人可能面临被解雇的高风险。瑞典的立法和政策可能需要进行改革,以向雇主施加更大的压力来促进RTW。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号